[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Daily Telegraph interview with Pete 02.06.01

To: John Hughes <john@pureneasy.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Daily Telegraph interview with Pete 02.06.01
From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: thewho@igtc.com
In-Reply-To: <3B1AA785.39405597@pureneasy.fsnet.co.uk>
Reply-To: thewho@igtc.com
Sender: owner-thewho@igtc.com

> >   It was quite a subversive book, though Kuhn seems to have
> blundered into the controversy quite unaware.  As John H.
demonstrated, the ideas still have a lot of power to annoy the
scientific community.
> 
> Well, I believe not so much annoy the scientific community, more
> leave one aghast at the incorrect nature of them. 

Maybe I'm representing it poorly, John.  Read it and let me know what
you think.

LB

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

References:
- Re: Daily Telegraph interview with Pete 02.06.01
  - From: John Hughes <john@pureneasy.fsnet.co.uk>

Prev by Date: stream of consciousness
Next by Date: genius
Prev by thread: Re: Daily Telegraph interview with Pete 02.06.01
Next by thread: Re: Daily Telegraph interview with Pete 02.06.01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread