[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who forgot Who Covered Who?
> The Who deserve better than a tribute album that treats their songs with
> classic-rock reverence - but that's exactly what Substitute does.
Brian:
So they've completely written off the previous Who Covers Who? Which didn't
"treat the songs with reverence" as far as I can tell. From what I'm getting
here, it sounds like WCW is a lot better even considering it being mostly
unknown artists (Blur and Ian McLagan are on it).
Rolling Stone has never had a good word to say about The Who since Who's
Next. It's hard to give them any credit given this (seeming) prevailing
attitude.
"If a person doesn't have the capacity that we all
want that person to have, I suspect hope is in
the far distant future, if at all."
George "pearls of wisdom" Bush
Cheers ML