[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Napster shutdown



Since that link didn't post very well, here's the whole article from
Associated Press
:
Court Says Napster Must Stop 
The Associated Press
Monday, Feb. 12, 2001; 1:34 p.m. EST

SAN FRANCISCO –– A federal appeals court ruled Monday that the
music-swapping service Napster must stop trading in copyrighted material
and may be held liable for "vicarious copyright infringement." 

Napster must prevent users from gaining access to copyrighted content
through its lists of songs archived by the service's users, the 9th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals said. Napster officials have said such a ruling
could force them to shut down the service. 

In a 58-page opinion, a three-judge panel told a lower court judge to
rewrite her injunction to focus more narrowly on the copyrighted
material. The panel also directed the Redwood City-based company to
remove links to users trading copyrighted songs stored as MP3 files. 

"This is a clear victory. The court of appeals found that the injunction
is not only warranted, but required. And it ruled in our favor on every
legal issue presented," said Hilary Rosen, president and chief executive
of the Recording Industry Association of America. 

Napster can stay in business until U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel
retools her injunction, which the appellate court called overly broad. 

Millions of users had flooded the company's computer servers this past
weekend to download free music, fearing an immediate shutdown of the
service that has changed the face of music. Napster has an estimated 50
million users. 

Webnoize, which monitors the digital entertainment economy, estimated
that 250 million songs were downloaded using Napster over the weekend.
Webnoize said that, on average, 1.5 million users were logged on to the
system at any one time. 

Major record labels hope Monday's ruling will force millions of computer
users to start paying for music the online music swapping service has
allowed them to get for free. 

The digital music technology Napster made popular is here to stay either
way. The recording industry appears stymied by the notion of funneling
music to consumers via the Internet for a price while freely available
computer applications allow even the computer novice to do it for free. 

The five largest record labels – Sony, Warner, BMG, EMI and Universal –
sued as soon as Napster took off, saying it could rob them of billions of
dollars in profits. 

In May 1999, Napster founder Shawn Fanning released software that made it
easy for personal computer users to locate and trade songs they had
stored as computer files in the MP3 format, which crunches digital
recordings down to manageable lengths without sacrificing quality. 

The concept of "peer-to-peer" song trading quickly proved too popular to
contain. As Napster users grew by the millions, other file-sharing
programs also popped up, such as Gnutella and Freenet. And the labels
themselves are looking to use the same technology, only with paying
subscribers and secure digital formats that prevent copying. 

After the appellate judges began deliberating in October, Napster made
agreements with former business foes like Bertelsmann AG, the parent
company of the BMG music unit. The German media giant has promised
much-needed capital if Napster switches to a subscription-based service
that pays artists' royalties. 

The other four major labels not reached any similar agreement.