[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pure Pop for now people
- To: TheWho@igtc.com
- Subject: Re: Pure Pop for now people
- From: Alan McKendree <amck@thenetdr.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:09:44 -0600
- In-Reply-To: <200011220353.eAM3r1g13634@igloo.igtc.com>
- References: <200011220353.eAM3r1g13634@igloo.igtc.com>
- Sender: owner-thewho@igtc.com
>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:09:42 -0500
>From: "Mark R. Leaman" <mleaman@sccoast.net>
>Pop in this sense isn't the same as Pop music, even though both are both
>based on the word "popular." Pop Art is considered very much of its time and
>reflects some aspect or aspects of modern culture, whereas Pop music is
>simply very bright and happy music.
That's the way I've always thought of it (which is why for years I
strenuously objected to calling The Who a "pop" band), but British
usage of "pop" still means "popular" as opposed to "classical" -- art
or music.
Cheers,
--
Alan
"That's unbelievable, if that's true."
--Howard Stern, 5/25/00