[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Economics, "Bang! The Future of Rock And Roll," the past

To: TheWho@igtc.com
Subject: Re: Economics, "Bang! The Future of Rock And Roll," the past
From: Phil McRevis <legalize@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:48:53 -0700
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:48:33 -0500. <v04003a00b4e1850bdf90@[129.79.16.189]>
Organization: multi-cellular, biological
Reply-To: legalize@xmission.com
Sender: owner-thewho@igtc.com


In article <v04003a00b4e1850bdf90@[129.79.16.189]>,
    Jim Topp <jtopp@ophelia.ucs.indiana.edu>  writes:

> what good did "the label's support" do for The Who's Isle of Wight?

For that matter what good has the "label's support" done for the Who
since the mid 70s?

--
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/>	Legalize Adulthood!
    ``Ain't it funny that they all fire the pistol,     
      at the wrong end of the race?''--PDBT     
legalize@xmission.com	<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/who/>

References:
- Economics, "Bang! The Future of Rock And Roll," the past
  - From: Jim Topp <jtopp@ophelia.ucs.indiana.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Obscure and Oblique Questions
Next by Date: Swedish Dan & B-Day Rog
Prev by thread: Economics, "Bang! The Future of Rock And Roll," the past
Next by thread: Swedish Dan & B-Day Rog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread