A ton of new Who

["Mark R. Leaman" <mleaman@sccoast.net>]

>So your definition of "damage" is winning the Cold War and lowering taxes,

Jim:

The culmination of decades of work by thousands, and HE gets the credit? I
think not. You must have forgotten it happened during Bush's five minutes
anyway. As for taxes, most people's went up. For the record. Most of us
aren't in the top two percent, you see. I know it's hard for you to
understand, but you must...you must...
As for my definition of damage, how much money does the greatest country on
earth, leader of the free world, still owe because of this one man? How long
will our children have to pay off his 12 year party, to which most of us
were not invited? Don't even try me on this one. Reagan was a REAL criminal,
not some guy getting a little consensual sex when he shouldn't. Reagan's
lies were BIG, serious, and affected the entire population of this country.

>which gave us the economic prosperity we still enjoy today?

THAT man is still in office now, and his partner will be in for the next 8,
so don't sweat it...I'm very relaxed. Happy, even. We have a ton of new Who
coming, and today I'm off to the Smokies to camp this morning (despite the
predicted 20 degree nights).

>I second that!

Tracy:

OK, sorry. Just wanted to set the record straight. You know, we wouldn't be
getting all this new Who if not for the current prosperity. How much new Who
did we get during the Regan years? Hell, the situation was enough to make
Pete throw in the towel!