[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: After the fire



I'm new to this list, I've been reading it for a month now, but I'm not new
to THE WHO, Some of these discussions boggle my mind. Debating whether The
Who cut it compared to The Stones or U2, I just don't understand.  For me, I
love alot of other music and respect many other bands, but there is only one
"WHO" for me, and I guess for many of you as well.  Who cares who sells out
what? (no pun intended) Who cares who broke up and who didn't.  Who cares
what anyone else thinks? It's doesn't seem worth debating... The Who are
it... at least for me. 
----------
>From: TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com (The Who Mailing List Digest)
>To: TheWho-Digest@igtc.com
>Subject: The Who Mailing List Digest V6 #112
>Date: Thu, May 6, 1999, 9:53 PM
>

>he U.S.
>> They were still one of the few most popular bands in the world.  Compared
>> to then, The Who are not even a blip on the radar screen now.
>
>Not true at ALL! After not being together for 7 years, they were able to
>tour the world and obviously make enough to make it worth it. Their
>contemps, like The Stones, never broke up and can't do much better. Even U2
>didn't sell out their last tour. Think about it.
>
>
>                    Cheers                                 ML