Re: This isn't a Black Crowes song!

["Whooooo!" <whoooo@labyrinth.net>]

    Mark, it is difficult to convey my viewpoint when my posts never make it
through. I told Paul that I would apologize if I were wrong, but the fact
remains that every reply I have made to an anti-Fang mail has not posted. I am
skeptical that this post will appear. Also, my post on the PT site is based on
what I read in here: several people called for members of this list to "rally"
and team-up against Fang on Pete's site. Then, there appears a plethora of
anti-Fang posts. I just wanted my view to appear, and I am thankful that Pete
Townshend doesn't censor opposing speech on his site yet.

    By the way, I joined this list because I thought it had value, even though
its who content is less technical and really less informative. But I'll tell
you in no uncertain terms: if views on this list are the product of the
listowner's orchestration, so that it is only a mouthpiece for the views of Big
Pauley, your list is not only a fraud, but it is worthless rag of
propaganda.      .

"Mark R. Leaman" wrote:

> Sean:
>
> I don't know why you're doing this, both here and on the PT list, but it
> has no basis in reality and I suggest you not create a conspiracy where
> none now exists. Most of the people here haven't any idea who Fang is, and
> you don't get a constant degrading of Scott's list on this one, either. If
> you don't like it here, then why are you here?
> As for a "kiddie list," I'll let the maturity level on both lists determine
> which most deserves the title.
>
> >     One of the biggest complaints about this list is that members discuss
> only
> > academic things
>
> Yeah, isn't it terrible to be academic...
>
>        Cheers                  ML
>
> If you own a CD player, you need to check out our website:
>
> http://www.generations.theshoppe.com/