[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Keith's b-day



>William Spencer Watson wrote:
>
>> I don't mean to sound picky, but he would have been 53.  One of the many
>> things we learn in the Fletcher bio is that Keith was actually born in
>> '46, not '47 as we've always been led to believe.
>
>Joseph wrote:
>
>    I know exactly what your talking about from Keith's bio, but what about
>the INFAMOUS Holiday Inn for Keith's SUPPOSED 21st birthday back in '67,
>where he was ACTUALLY only 20, but PRETENDED to be 21 to the media so
>that he wouldn't get carded at bars/pubs anymore?

It's simple. He had already established the lie about his age. So in '67 he
was a twenty-one-year-old pretending to be a twenty-year-old pretending to
be a twenty-one-year-old.