Re: Daltrey's Stinky Movie

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

Oh, yeah, if I'm not mistaken, this was a made-for-TV Showtime movie, not 
straight to video.  Why are made-for-TV movies and specials often so bad?  
Low budget and short time frame?

keets


>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>To: TheWho@igtc.com
>Subject: Re: Daltrey's Stinky Movie
>Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 06:32:40 PDT
>
>Actually the movie in general is awful--the script is bad, the costumes are 
>bad, the production is bad--but Roger got decent reviews for acting.  He 
>did a melodramatic, camp interpretation that seemed to go down pretty well 
>with Vampirella fans.  Interestingly, he did a song on the soundtrack that 
>I thought was very bad.
>
>keets
>
>
>>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>>To: TheWho@igtc.com
>>CC: TheWho@igtc.com
>>Subject: Daltrey's Stinky Movie
>>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 99 17:58:23 PDT
>>
>>On the subject of Roger Daltrey movies:
>>
>>Did anyone mention he was in the movie version of Vampirella (sp?).  She's
>>a  female, vampire comic book hero that someone made a  straight-to-video
>>movie (I think) about.  Roger has the lead villianous role...and he's 
>>quite
>>bad in it; it was sometimes painful to watch !  I think Daltrey gets the
>>short end of the stick a lot of times but movies like this don't help.
>>However, it is better than any movie I've ever been in !!  Long Live The
>>WHO !!!!
>>
>>			- Schrade (in Akron).
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com