[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rock and Roll as a buisness
How the hell is anybody going to hear about the songs if they aren't
played ont he radio???? It's not an issue of selling out, It's a form
of exposing fans to new music. A "sellout" to me is when a band will
crank out any kind of shit music just to get it on the radio.
Like U2 for example. After Rattle and Hum ...I don't know what the hell
they are doing.
Just a few comments..not meant to piss anyone in particular off
Naked Eye
>From owner-thewho@igtc.com Thu Apr 23 12:16:25 1998
>Received: (from daemon@localhost)
> by igtc.igtc.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) id MAA05085
> for thewho-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from imo23.mx.aol.com (imo23.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.67])
> by igtc.igtc.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id MAA05081
> for <thewho@igtc.COM>; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from Dover87@aol.com
> by imo23.mx.aol.com (IMOv14.1) id 3BOFa06269
> for <thewho@igtc.COM>; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:14:07 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Dover87 <Dover87@aol.com>
>Message-ID: <82602592.353f9301@aol.com>
>Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:14:07 EDT
>To: thewho@igtc.COM
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Subject: Rock and Roll as a buisness
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 58
>Sender: owner-thewho@igtc.com
>Precedence: bulk
>
>Hey all,
>Today i had an argument with a friend of mind about the money involved
in rock
>and roll. Being a big fan of the hardcore scene developing in new
york, my
>friend insisted that all bands sold out if their songs were on the
radio
>because they would be payed royalties for everytime it was on the
radio. I
>said that this was a load of crap and that i had always thought that
once a
>record had been released or given to station by a representitive of the
group
>the station was free to play it when ever they please. Was i right
about
>this? anyone with different opinions?
>
>Also, he said that he hated how big name rock groups are only in it for
the
>money once they start playing arena's because they charge $50 per show
as
>opposed to $5 per hardcore show. To this i told him first of all,
there is a
>much bigger demand for a group such as the Who or the Stones or any
other
>band with tremendous popularity. Although some hardcore bands may have
an
>opportunity to play venue's bigger than a club, most dont. I also said
it
>isn't neccassarily the band who raises the price but the promoters
because if
>the band is big enough to sell out concerts and headline tours, they
will be
>able to bring in quite a bit of money even if tickets were 5 bucks a
pop.
>
>Any Thoughts?
>
>Ben
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com