Re: No WHO content - Just Bill (and Hillary) Bashing

>1- Bill and Hillary Clinton came to Washington and brought with them 3 of
>Hillary's law firm partners.  It is now 3 1/2  years later and one is doing
>hard time (W. Hubbell) one has left the White House in disgrace (William
>Kennedy) and one has committed suicide (Foster).

JJM:

You would write this at a time when MY time is limited and my monitor is
going in the shop! But in any case:
I've got news for ya, pal. Just because one person breaks a law, a friend or
a partner or even a spouse, that does in no way mean that another was
involved. If I break the speed limit, can the Police arrest my wife?
So this reasoning is faulty.

>2 -We have found that (while still in Arkansas) Hillary was able to help keep
>up the payments on Whitewater as a result of parlaying a $1,000. investment
>in cattle futures into $100,000.  The White House response once this came to
>light was "She read the Wall Street Journal."   This from the lady who while
>campaigning with her husband in '92 railed against "the decade of greed"
>presided over by Reagan/Bush.  Hipocrite?  You be the judge.

Wait a minute now. Are you trying to say that she's not allowed to make
money just because she derides the decade of greed? I'm in business and make
money, yet I find what Reagan did and the results distasteful. Apples and
oranges.
Besides, this has NOTHING to do with any wrongdoing. There is no evidence
that she did anything wrong in that investment...just innuendo.

>3 - The McDougals and Gov. Tucker are all about to go to jail (unless
>somebody starts singing) in the wake of the first Whitewater related trial.
> The McDougals were the Clinton's business partners.  Nothing found yet???

Anything about the Clintons yet? See answer # 1 and try harder. Now YOU
sound like Rush.

>4 - Bill Clinton's closest friend and advisor Bruce Linsday (who also ran his
>gubenatorial campaigns in Ark.) is now in very hot water also.

See above.

>5 - Hillary's law firm records (showing her involvement in case that smacks
>of conflict of interest) turn up in the first family's living quarters in the
>White House over 2 years after they had been subpoenaed and after the
>Clinton's had claimed they couldn't find them!!! 

Yeah, and they had her fingerprints on them...big deal. They were her
records! First of all, she most likely didn't handle them when they were in
the White House. Secondly, they're far from damning so why bother to hide
them? If they were damning, they never would have shown up. No, the most
likely explanation is that they were lost or hidden by an aide who thought
he/she was doing someone a favor. Using your logic, I suppose.

>6 - In the wake of Foster's death (The Clinton's personal lawyer on matters
>involving Whitewater) on one of the most traumatic days of their lives, 3 of
>Hillary's closest aides developed amnesia in trying to recall events
>surrounding the handling of Foster's files concerning Whitewater.  It seemed
>nobody could recall a thing about the chain of command of the files,
>telephone calls, etc..  Just a coincidence?

Listen very closely: even if Hillery did something wrong (and again, there's
been no proof of that as yet)...it doesn't mean a damned thing concerning
Bill Clinton. Understand? Someone who commits suicide isn't mentally stable,
which may not be obvious even to people close to him. But if nothing else,
it indicates who was actually guilty...that would be Foster himself. Is it a
stretch to believe that people close to him would try to protect him?

>I could go on and on and I haven't even mentioned the railroading of the
>Travel office empolyees or the latest FBI "filegate" matter.  These people
>are intoxicated with power.

These are completely unrelated and shows how desparate you are to make a
point with no evidence. I suppose that Hillery can't choose her own Travel
Office people????? You're looking for ANYTHING wrong, but the truth is
you've got nothing. Next you'll be mentioning the "haircut incident" (which,
as it turned out, was completely and utterly false...no air traffic was held
up).

>It is true that with regard to Whitewater there is still no "smoking gun"
>connected to the Clinton's but please don't try to tell us it is all a
>witchhunt.

It is a witchhunt, and the Clintons have found to have been invloved in no
wrongdoing.

>Do you stand by your assertion "I didn't inhale" was a joking aside that SOME
>people took seriously???.  ARE YOU KIDDING?  THE COUNTRY took it seriously
>because it WAS NOT a joke. You thought it was funny?? Come again?  A
>bald-faced lie to a serious question!!  You are either very naive or just
>another shameless Clinton apologist.

Give me a break. No one should have taken it seriously, and only people
desperate to find something wrong when they saw their party losing control
after 12 years would see it so. If you really believe that he was serious,
then I have to question your motives here. If Clinton wanted to lie about
it, he would have said: "I never smoked Pot." Instead, he gave a light
answer that deserate people took and tried to make something of.
And you want to call ME naive? Ha!

>Bill Clinton is a man of enormous talents and intellect.  He is a also a very
>flawed individual who always manages to avoid "paying the bill."  His time
>may running out.

What, you mean because of Dole? Yeah...




                   Cheers                   ML

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."  L. Long