[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Who's For Tennis?" (part 2)
- Subject: Re: "Who's For Tennis?" (part 2)
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 14:28:57 -0400
Aaron, re:
>I had trouble with part c, the way you phrased it made it seem as though
>you were getting a free copy for helping him advertise on the Who mailing
>list.
Money is not an issue with me... You don't really think I need to be "bribed"
for $12-$15 tape, do you???
BTW, if I was to get something for free, my review would still be the same as
if I paid for it...
>>Indeed it did. Just keeping ya honest, Fang!
You may not like what I say or how I say it, but I'm ALWAYS honest..
- -wf