[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Quad: MCA vs. Polydor
- Subject: Re: New Quad: MCA vs. Polydor
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 08:19:57 -0400
This has struck me as weird from the beginning. I bought the new
MCA on day 1, but I was on vacation at the time. I listened to it
good and loud many times and loved it. I then get off vacation and
there's all these messages about bad mixes and flat sound. I don't
remember hearing anything of the sort! So I read in detail where all
the flawed mixes are, then go back and listen again. Except for a few
things (that tape noise at the head of 5:15), I still don't hear them.
Then wf posts that the Polydor is much better in a way that seems to
reflect my hearing of my MCA Quad.
I'm beginning to suspect that some of the MCA Quads (mine,
mleaman's) are identical to the Polydor, while a lot of the MCA's are
some poorly-mastered mix.
Quick! Let's all fly to a central location and compare CD's! I'd
say here in Atlanta, but it's crowded here now.
-Brian
In the center of the Olympic ring