[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hyde Park
- Subject: Re: Hyde Park
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 19:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
At 02:01 PM 7/1/96 -0700, Blaine wrote:
>The SF Chronicle has a review of Hyde Park. Not
>favorable, but the woman who wrote it based it
>upon the premise that Quad doesn't have enough
>of a story (as compared to Tommy) to justify a
>staging. She's obviously low on the clue meter.
She also probably (1) simply ripped off the
London Times article (same angle) and (2) was
stupid enough to review it as a musical instead
of a concert with some of the trappings of both
film and stage performances. "The answers you get
depend on the questions you ask." In this case,
the mainstream media apparently pre-decided that
this would be a stale rehash and are struggling
gamely to make the facts fit their preconceptions.
I suspect I can round up 150,000 people to
disagree.
Bad defeats Good then self-destructs ...