[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #504
- Subject: Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #504
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 19:57:54 -0700
At 07:07 PM 8/1/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
>The Who Mailing List Digest Thursday, 1 August 1996
>Volume 03 : Number 504
>
>In this issue:
>
> Re: JAE Anthology - better late than never
> Re: Go Team Go! Rah Rah Rah!
> Re: NY's lovely smell
> Frustrated parent
> re: Subject: Re: New "Quad"--MCA Piece of <Picard> confirmed!
> New Greatest Hits CD
> Allmans Back Cover/Stage (no Who content)
> 53 Across and Four Rooms
> Yikes!! The war drums are beating!
> Re: Unsubscribing
> WW1
> Re: books and things
> Cheap
> Re: Talkin' bout my pepsi generation
> Rock is dead
> Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #503
> TrainsPLOTting
> Re: American Music - Shallow? & Rock Is Dead
> Attn: Listers in the Washington D.C. are...I need some help....
> re: Subject: Third Quality Post
>
>See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the The Who
>mailing list and on how to retrieve back issues.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>From: btm805@btrtx9.hrz.uni-bayreuth.de (B. Gramlich)
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 20:10:07 +0200
>Subject: Re: JAE Anthology - better late than never
>
>Nearly 12 weeks after having ordered it at the record store next door, I
>finally got my copy of the `Entwistle Anthology' today. It was heavily
>overpriced, as I had already expected. These morons really had re-imported a
>German export from the US, as they had announced before. I don't know how
>often I had tried to convince them that it would be way easier to just order
>the CD from a German distributor, if not the record company itself, but they
>had been entirely stubborn even after I had started calling them idiots. After
>all, what does a fan know about ordering records? Record store staff are way
>more clever, and therefore they decide what has to be done...
>
>Anyway, I made peace today with the shopkeeper who happens to be a casual Who
>fan and really appreciates my stories about Hyde Park and MSG and respects me
>as his #1 Polydor Quad costumer.
>
>After the reviews on this list, I had expected to get an excellent CD, but what
>I really got was much better - it simply blew me away right during my first
>listening. It's my first Entwistle solo recording, so most of the songs were
>entirely new to me, but yet they rocked at once. The sound quality is simply
>outstanding. So, if anybody here is still in doubt whether to buy it or not -
>get it! It's more than worth its price even after crossing the pond twice...
>
>I don't know whether it has been mentioned here before, but did anybody else
>notice the wrong spelling of `Whistle Rymes' in the liner notes...? :-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bernd
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: btm805@btrtx9.hrz.uni-bayreuth.de (B. Gramlich)
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 20:12:19 +0200
>Subject: Re: Go Team Go! Rah Rah Rah!
>
>Mark, Re:
>
>> Then the most childish event to date takes place...he gets his brother to
>> tell me I should bow to his superiority and be afraid of him, once again in
>> public.
>
>Huh? Are you implying that I might have asked my brother to speak up here?
>Rest assured - I didn't. His note was simply an expression of his thoughts and
>feelings, and it should be taken as such. The only thing I really liked about
>it was the `twenty nice years' line.
>
>Just for the record: Last time I met my brother was on June 29 at the
>beginning of the Hyde Park concert. Among other topics of conversation, I
>explained him how to subscribe to the list. My next contact with him was
>writing a letter for his birthday on July 12, the only list-related content
>being a short comment that I might go to the concerts at MSG. After that, I
>didn't have any contact with him before he posted his comments to the list.
>
>I hope this helps.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bernd
>
>
>ignored:
>
> - simplified history of the flame war
> - your claim not to be a bad guy
> - your self-defense against Natalie's comments
> - threats against me
> - threats and insults against Natalie
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: cuda340@tribeca.ios.com (`cuda 340)
>Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 14:43:07 -0500
>Subject: Re: NY's lovely smell
>
>Chris H., Re:
>
>>The Gary steel mills have possibly the worst smell on earth, with the dog
>>food factories in Lafayette Indiana a close second.
>
> I stopped in a town in Kentucky once, I forgot the name, but there
>was an enormous whisky distillery right on the edge of town. No matter
>where you went you couldn't escape this smell, which was like having one
>NYC homeless man following you around all the time.
> Stacey.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: Kevin Winn <kwinn@steptech.com>
>Date: 01 Aug 96 11:30 PST
>Subject: Frustrated parent
>
>From: jennett@primenet.com (G. P. Jennett)
>>>>
>My daughter subscribed to the Who Digest several weeks ago without my
>permission. I have now sent the unsubscribe message to Majordomo@igtc.com
>seven times. The automated response from the mailing list manager has
>several times said that the unsubscribe was successful and seeveral times
>that jennett@primenet.com is not on the mailing list. However, the Who
>Digest keeps coming back! If this stupid, immature groupie crap doesn't
>stop showing up in my mail server, I'm going to declare war on you.
><<<
>Hey, dad, try sending a message to the list owner. He'd be happy to help
>you. And good luck with your "discipline problems"...<snicker>...
>
>>>>
>You guys need to get a life.
><<<
>
>And you need to get a laxative...
>
>OK,
>KLW
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: Luke Pacholski <LukPac@newrock.com>
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 14:03:19 -0500
>Subject: re: Subject: Re: New "Quad"--MCA Piece of <Picard> confirmed!
>
>WFang01@aol.com spake:
>
>>The other irony of this thing, were those of you who thought the new MCA
>>sounded great. The old one was <Picard>, and this one was a different kinda
>><Picard>, but <Picard> just the same...
>
>Well, I think it has been stated that there may be some good MCA copies and
>some bad ones. I have not heard _any_ of the new mixes, but I am sure
>people would not be saying it sounded great if it was really as bad as you
>said...
>
>Luke
>
>- ---
>
>LukPac@newrock.com
>http://www.corenet.net/lukpac/
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: Luke Pacholski <LukPac@newrock.com>
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 14:04:45 -0500
>Subject: New Greatest Hits CD
>
>When is the new Greatest Hits comp due out? Does anyone have a confirmed
>track list yet?
>
>Luke
>
>- ---
>
>LukPac@newrock.com
>http://www.corenet.net/lukpac/
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: mleaman@sccoast.net (Mark Leaman)
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:24:53 -0400
>Subject: Allmans Back Cover/Stage (no Who content)
>
>>>I was a roadie.
>>
>>Mark,
>>That you on the back cover of "At Fillmore East"?
>
>Chris:
>
>No! Ha ha ha! I'll have to look at that picture again.
>I was a lowly roadie working for the promotor, not the band. I hauled amps
>and speakers, for the most part. I worked the August Jam in 1974 (eastern
>version of the California Jam, for those who remember that one) where the
>Allmans and ELP co-headed the bill. I was "picked up" by ELP there and
>worked for them for the next 3 weeks before realizing that I wasn't getting
>any A) money B) food C) sleep D) money. If I had stuck, I would have been AT
>the California Jam, but alas...I missed my chance at being a part of Rock
>history. We were nowhere near the band 90% of the time, and I can only claim
>to have almost met Keith Emerson once...he acknowledged my existance, let's
>put it that way. I, not wanting to fawn all over him, left it at that. Lots
>of other perks, like the women and drugs, but...overall, it wasn't THE dream
>job as one might imagine.
>A quick story: 3/4 through their set, Gregg A. passed out and was carried
>from the stage. The band carried on with a loooonnng drum solo...so long
>that diehard fans were leaving the place. After about 30 minutes of trying
>to wake him, they were finally successful and he returned to the stage,
>bleary. As was the rest of the set. I was backstage there, and watched as
>they tried to wake him. Too much alcohol, as their personal little AB cups
>all reeked of whiskey. A shame...
>
>
>
> Cheers ML
>
>
>"For three generations, Pepsi has trying to make people to believe it's `The
>Pepsi Generation.' This is the first one dumb enough to believe it."
> Unknown
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: mleaman@sccoast.net (Mark Leaman)
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:25:02 -0400
>Subject: 53 Across and Four Rooms
>
>>53 The Who's "Love Reign _____ Me"
>
>Bruce:
>
>On a related note, I was watching the comedy Four Rooms last night, and
>during the final segment there's a guy yelling: "Bell Boy, bell boy!" to
>which a character says (to a Bell Boy): "Don't mind him. Quadrophenia, you
>know."
>PS it's a really funny and twisted movie.
>
>
>
> Cheers ML
>
>
>"For three generations, Pepsi has trying to make people to believe it's `The
>Pepsi Generation.' This is the first one dumb enough to believe it."
> Unknown
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: DONNE053@mailgate.navsses.navy.mil (Donnelly, Michael)
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 16:07 EST
>Subject: Yikes!! The war drums are beating!
>
>From: jennett@primenet.com (G. P. Jennett)
>
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 06:10:16 -0700
>
>Subject: Unsubscribing
>
>
>
>>My daughter subscribed to the Who Digest several weeks ago without my
>
>>permission. I have now sent the unsubscribe message to
>Majordomo@igtc.com
>
>>seven times. The automated response from the mailing list manager has
>
>>several times said that the unsubscribe was successful and seeveral
>times
>
>>that jennett@primenet.com is not on the mailing list. However, the Who
>
>>Digest keeps coming back! If this stupid, immature groupie crap doesn't
>
>>stop showing up in my mail server, I'm going to declare war on you.
>
>
>
>>You guys need to get a life.
>
>
>
>- ------------------------------
>
>
>
>This has to be one of the funniest posts (and cheesiest pieces of flame
>bait) in quite some time. According to Andy's recent post on scoring the
>non-who related posts, I'm giving this one a 9.8 (I've got to leave the
>9.9 and 10.0 open in case WF or Mark come back with a great reply). And
>WF (or anyone else) where did you get your copy of PolyQuad? I haven't
>been able to find it around Philly. Did you special order it or get it
>in NY? I'm also trying to get JE's Anthology if you have a source for
>that too.
>
>
>
>md
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "." <microdot@algonet.se>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 96 22:32:26 -0500
>Subject: Re: Unsubscribing
>
>- -- [ From: . * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>Re:
>>My daughter subscribed to the Who Digest several weeks ago without my
>permission. I have now sent >the unsubscribe message to Majordomo@igtc.com
>seven times
>
>My daughter also subscribed to the Who Digest several weeks ago without my
>permission, but we linger...oh what will these kids get up to next!
>
>Sounds like you have no idea WHAT your kids are doing on the computer...
>maybe you should take a class...?
>
>>You guys need to get a life.
> I have a very enjoyable one. Do you?
>
>Jon
>- --
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "." <microdot@algonet.se>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 96 22:32:56 -0500
>Subject: WW1
>
>- -- [ From: . * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>Re:
>> I was making some big assumptions, one being that in the 20-30 year
>period after the conclusion of >WW1, a victorious Germany would have
>developed politically pretty much along the same lines as >France and the UK
>, therefore not keeping a large standing army or being particularly
>belligerent...
>
>WHAT France? Do you think the UK would just stand aside and watch Germany
>take the whole show? WHAT UK?! *I* for one am glad the krauts got their
>asses kicked in the first war AND the second.
>
>>...therefore not keeping a large standing army or being particularly
>belligerent...
>
>Some people will always be blind.
>
>>...therefore not keeping a large standing army or being particularly
>belligerent...
>
>I cannot believe someone in 1996 would say this.
>
>
>Jon
>- --
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "." <microdot@algonet.se>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 96 22:33:21 -0500
>Subject: Re: books and things
>
>- -- [ From: . * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>> I have three cats - all gray (as a good Confederate should be) and named
>after three of my favorite CS >cavalry generals: Bedford (after Nathan
>Bedford Forrest), Mosby (after John S. Mosby - the "Gray Ghost") >and Morgan
>(after the Kentucky Cavalier John Hunt Morgan). They all exhibit traits
>that their namesakes >did too.
>
>I have one cat - orange and named after the one on the TEEvee: Felix. I
>suspect he is a nazi, but I love him anyway. He is one cold sonofabitch.
>
>Jon
>- --
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "." <microdot@algonet.se>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 96 22:33:43 -0500
>Subject: Cheap
>
>- -- [ From: . * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>Re:
>>Anyone out there know how i can save my digests onto disk if
>>i have a pc with a non-graphics internet account from ids and
>>does anyone know how i can remove all this feuding crap and other
>>useless information from my files so it doesn't take up space?
>
>Yeah. Throw your 286 in the trash and get something new, or get a new HDD...
>on second thought, just throw the 286 away.
>
>Jon
>- --
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "." <microdot@algonet.se>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 96 22:34:09 -0500
>Subject: Re: Talkin' bout my pepsi generation
>
>- -- [ From: . * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>Re:
>>DON'T go after Pepsi, too! I will not tolerate my beverage of choice being
>badmouthed! You may trash >religion, but not my POP (soda, cola, whatever
>it's called in anybody's neck of the woods)!
>
>I agree! The best pop is Pepsi Max! International travellers to the US:
>refer to soft drinks as "pop" and long sandwiches as "subs", otherwise, you
>won't be understood!
>
>Go Lions/Tigers/Pistons/Wings!!
>...not to forget the U of M Wolverines, who'll crash anyone's party!
>
>Jon
>
>- --
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: "Gary M. Gillman" <garyg@inforamp.net>
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Rock is dead
>
>My take on this is that the rock era had a natural lifespan of about 25
>years, say from the mid-50's to 1980. The high point of the Who's career
>falls just about at the mid-point of this curve and represents its zenith in
>terms of artistic greatness. The Who took the best of what went before them,
>added to it immeasurably, and bequeathed the precious legacy to the 70's
>rockers, the best of whom added their own magic. The curve ended in creative
>terms with the Sex Pistols, Ramones, early Elvis Costello and Van Halen
>(personally I can't include the Clash, who always struck me as musical
>amateurs). Nor should this surprise or disappoint us. Blues, Ragtime, Swing,
>Be-Bop and other musical styles all had their well-defined eras and classic
>practitioners. This is not to say interest in these styles isn't
>meaningfully revived from time to time; hence for example the blues revival
>of the 60's, which influenced rock of course. But no one expects (I think) a
>musician to exceed or even equal what, say, Bird did for a certain kind of
>jazz. This doesn't mean that some very fine artists can't come along once in
>a while working in an established style or even synthesising two or more of
>them, eg. Johnny Winter, Springsteen, Steely Dan, and I would say Pearl Jam
>and possibly Green Day. Some of these are better than others of course, eg.
>Oasis strikes me as totally unoriginal and contrived; but the true
>breakthrough which creates or is the genesis of a new style comes along only
>rarely. Thus, the next wave to break won't sound like the
>Who/Kinks/Beatles/Stones/Zep melange characteristic of the current Britpop
>sound. We don't know (by definition) what it will sound like. I don't
>discount the theories about changes in the music biz, MTV and other external
>factors, but I believe that while these, and purely fortuitous factors (eg.
>that the Beatles found Epstein and the Who Lambert) play their role, what
>creates any great artistic movement is, principally, genius - that rare
>and unpredictable sine qua non of any great art....Gary M.
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: Scott Hudson Alumni <hudson@inst.augie.edu>
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 16:33:43 -0500 (CDT)
>Subject: Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #503
>
>I've stayed out of all of this silly "nothing has been done in rock since
>the Who" stuff, but I have to respond to something I read today. Because
>one poster didn't like the P.J. Harvey album, that means that Christgau's
>proclamation of genius is wrong? C'mon, his love of her music is HIS
>opinion, just as your hatred of her is YOUR opinion. Nothing more, nothing
>less. There isn't a right or wrong answer. Personally, I hate Yes and ELP
>and all of the others that have been getting some nice mentions lately. I
>also am a fan of Bob Mould, who's gotten quite a bit of bad press. Nobody
>is right or wrong, it's just a matter of taste.
>
>Scott
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: Mark Tilson <marktil@vossnet.co.uk>
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 20:46:01 +0100
>Subject: TrainsPLOTting
>
>Dave wrote:
>
>> Can anyone briefly summarize what the book/movie "Trainspotting" is about?
>
>It's about a group of kids who have lived in Edinburgh and grown up together
>and are in about their early 20s. It just deals with their characters and
>everyday lives - hard drugs and their consequences, sex, unemployment, crime,
>killing time. It's bleak, but credible and entertaining. There's not a great
>deal of plot, just a chronological sequence of events with an ending. The
>book may be a bit difficult to follow, because it's written in a Scottish
>accent, with many slang terms. Chapters are narrated "first person", by
>different main characters, which makes for interesting perspective shifts.The
>central character is called Mark Renton, nicknamed "Rents" or "Rentboy".
>
>Cheers,
>Mark T.
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: mleaman@sccoast.net (Mark Leaman)
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:58:44 -0400
>Subject: Re: American Music - Shallow? & Rock Is Dead
>
>Mark T commented:
>>Hmmm. I think you're right about the cycles. There are a few things in the
>82 - 89 period I would regard as worthwhile, but there always exceptions to
>any rule.
>
>Of course! Townshend was doing quite good work during that period. My
>favorite PT solo album is WHITE CITY, for instance. Nothing is a complete
>vacuum as far as Rock music is concerned.
>
>>Interestingly enough, Steve Marriott and Phil Collins were child actors.
>
>That is interesting.
>
>>Anyway, I'd be interested to know more about your roadie experiences.
>
>I've already posted some of them, which will be in the next Digest I guess.
>Maybe not that interesting, but factual at least.
>
>>I mentioned ELP and Rick Wakeman (solo) because I believe they're talented
>British musicians who struggled in the content department, perhaps because
>they >were trying to stretch it too far.
>
>Well, Daltrey accuses Townshend of no less than trying to stretch Rock music
>too far...but I agree with you. And don't with Daltrey. I think QUAD was
>well handled, and it's a great shame that Pete pretty much gave up
>stretching (with The Who, anyway) after that.
>
>>Actually, I think you're right about the Dancehall/Music Hall element. The
>Kinks are indeed a fine example, as perhaps is Steve Marriott with the
>Small Faces. There's a lot of cockney "knees-up" in both of these acts'
>work. Is that what you were getting at?
>
>Yes, that's it. The Small Faces are a good example. "Won't it be nice/To get
>on with me neighbors..."
>I believe firmly that all British Rock bands of the `60s were thus
>influenced. Take a song like Cobwebs And Strange...a bit Dancehall, no? A
>bit campy and over-the-top. A lot of the earlier Who music was over-the-top,
>and I believe that tradition came from Dancehall. Some of the commercials on
>SELL OUT show this element, filtered through (no doubt) the advertising
>style which came from DH and so it goes around and around...
>Herman's Hermits were perhaps the most influenced...at least, of the bands
>I'm familiar with. THEY might be the "British Monkees."
>
>>Could the lack of awareness of the new stuff be in part due to an
>inadequacy of American music magazines?
>
>There are so many American music magazines that I can't answer that. I've
>given up on them all. No doubt there are some that deal exclusively with
>Indy music, and some Alternative...and I can't think of any that cover all
>types of music (anyone know?). The older bands, like The Who, are covered in
>the large ones (Rolling Stone, which about ten years ago became more like
>People if you're familiar with that one), but until a band "makes it" and is
>therefore dubbed worthy...they get no coverage.
>
>And Jack asked:
>>Did Ramones listen to Pete when they were kid's?? Check it out).
>
>The proof is in the pudding...The Ramones covered Substitute for their ACID
>EATERS album, so we can assume (I think) that they were indeed listening to
>The Who early on.
>Substitute is (as far as I know) the single most covered Who song.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers ML
>
>
>"For three generations, Pepsi has trying to make people to believe it's `The
>Pepsi Generation.' This is the first one dumb enough to believe it."
> Unknown
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: give@juno.com (Kevin Shupe)
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 18:02:29 EDT
>Subject: Attn: Listers in the Washington D.C. are...I need some help....
>
>If You are in the D.C.(or not) and can give me directions/info to the
>Capital Ballroom(Elvis Costello is playing there Aug. 9) it would highly
>appreciated if you could/would email me back about it.....Thanks...
>
>Kevin Shupe
>
>
>Your Higness, you are also like a stream of bat's piss.
>What?
>I merely meant, your Majesty that you shine out like a shaft of gold when
>all around is dark.
>
>------------------------------
>
>From: WFang01@aol.com
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 18:09:36 -0400
>Subject: re: Subject: Third Quality Post
>
>Larry, re:
>
>>>WFang: So what is Pete doing now? Any clue? Back to England for a few
>months?
>
>He took a short vacation and is back in the office...
>
>>>Also, nice comment to the hunchback looking for songs by The WHO about
>hunchbacks and you said it did not ring any bells.
>
>Well, I forgot to mention that The Who did perform "Jingle Bells". I have it
>on a few boots...
>
>>> Any clue as to how much fan-mail Pete & John get?
>
>I know Pete receives a lot more than John or Roger, since his business
>address has been posted in many different medias and I'm sure it varies
>depending on what he's up to for the moment (ie more after the release of a
>new album, etc...)
>
>>> Ah, so JAE did not feel like singing "Heaven & Hell" at Le Bar Bat.
> Thanks for the insights. They are much appreciated.
>
>Oh you're welcome. Although I'm not sure if I'll be posting this sort of
>information to the list in the future. I'm not very good at "Balancing On
>Wires" (ref to a Roger Daltrey song) so if there's a smigeon (I always liked
>that word) of a chance that I might be breaking a rule, I won't post the
>information.
>
>>>Also, concerning "our bass-player, Mr. John Entwistle", when I saw him in
>1988ish, he was still wearing a black, leather jacket on-stage and to me, was
>still a member of the WHO. Now when, I see him, I think of JAE as a stand
>alone
>kinda guy, with a distant connection to The WHO.
>
>I agree with that perspective. However, it seems there's been a lot of recent
>reconciliation, including John's comments in The Naked Eye. That, and
>according to Pete's calander for the next year (which someone I know had a
>glance at), it seems at the moment---THE WHO (or "TED") have a big role in it
>for both this "Quad" tour AND "Lifehouse"... But... as we know, here by the
>sea and sand, nothing ever goes as planned...
>
>>>Lastly, concerning "our bass player, Mr. John Entwistle", did you see Pete
>looking over at him during his bass solo's and laughing. Pete was truly
>entertained by JAE finger-work. John then gives Pete a quick smile, then
>back
>to the contemptuous look Pete so deservedly gets. Parts of me wish that Pete
>would get a grip whilst watching JAE fingers fly like chopsticks and think,
>"Yeah, let's do an album".
>
>Funny that you mention that... I was reading with amusement the new, updated
>"Maximum R&B" that I got from Greg at CVC Collectables (thanks Greg!) and I
>never knew that Pete had offered to do a NEW Who album in place of doing the
>'89 tour. Perhaps something good will come out of all this, besides some
>great live renditions of "Quadrophenia"...
>
>- -wf PS... if anyone has any info on Majordomo software, please e-mail me...
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #504
>******************************************
>
>To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
>
> subscribe thewho
>
>in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
>
>Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
>/pub/pmm/thewho.
>
>
- - - - - - - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #505
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - - - - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #506
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - - - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #507
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #508
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #509
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #510
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #511
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- - ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #512
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.
- ------------------------------
End of The Who Mailing List Digest V3 #513
******************************************
To subscribe to The Who Mailing List, send the command:
subscribe thewho
in the body of a message to majordomo@igtc.com
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
/pub/pmm/thewho.