Boots/also:Could you live with the horns?

[QuietOne <drjimmy@cnj.digex.net>]

> 
> 4) Excitement at your feet - From the FM broadcast of the Radio City concert.
> I thought their Tommy was a little flat, but the 2nd set was great.  However,
> the best track (I'm A Man) is available on the box set, and some of the Tommy
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> is on Join Togerther.

 Well, you are entitled to your opinion, but I thought that the 
 version of WGFA was pretty neat from Radio City. Something about
 the energy of this particular live version, even if it was with 
 the horns. The guitar solo by Bolton was pretty neat , especially
 after "hypnotized, Do ya?!?" part...He blended well with the horns.

 (Bonus Question: When did Pete start adding "Do ya?" to the 
  live versions? I know that he seems to say it very faintly
  on the original studio version.)

 I know I am going a little off the subject here, but does are there
 any listers that LIKE the Who with the horns ? 

 For the sake of arguement, say the Who stayed together as a band
 and made another record after the '89 tour. 

 Do you think that Pete would have had a "horn section" on the new album
 or would he just put in the "horn section" on the road ? ( Assuming
 everything was peachy in Whoville and they toured again..)

 What's your opinion ?

 I liked the horns. I thought that they captured alot of the Who's
 energy, but at the same time, I thought that songs like WGFA and
 BABA could have been hornless, out of respect, but that was Petes
 choice, so...I lived with it..

 Of course, I am one who never saw them with Kenny or before, so it
 was a thrill to see them play together and hear the songs. 


 Pete