Re: L@L in Rolling Stone

[QuietOne <drjimmy@cnj.digex.net>]

> Now I realize that Rolling Stone's focus is on new music (as it probably
> should be), but given the previously unreleased tracks on the disc, the
> influence that the Who has undoubtedly had on the newer groups, and the
> fact that the issue's headline review is Bruce Springsteen's new 'Best of'
> compilation (i.e., rereleased material as well), I think Live at Leeds
> deserved more attention than it received.
> 
> Sean Donnelly
> #011602

Well said, Sean. I agree. I think Rolling Stone tends to forget 
that there are people older than 21 that have read Rolling Stone
for a number of years and would like more attention to the bands
we grew up liking, as well as the new music scene.

Pete