Re: Reviews for the new reissues

[Jeff Williams <jeffw@mxim.com>]

> From list-owner-thewho-outgoing@cisco.com Tue Jul 11 21:32:32 1995
> X-Sender: ckt@best.com (Unverified)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type> : > text/plain> ; > charset="us-ascii"> 
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 21:07:30 -0800
> To: thewho@cisco.com
> From: ckt@best.com (Chris Thomas)
> Subject: Re: Reviews for the new reissues
> Sender: owner-thewho@cisco.com
> Content-Length: 421
> 
> Yes, these were done nicely.
> 
> I have a question, though.  Why, since all this strong
> unreleased material obviously exists, did they put
> "Daddy Rolling Stone" on the box set?  What a waste of valuable
> CD space.  I've seen poor reviews of the box on the basis of
> the weakness of that song alone.  Does a single person here
> think that song was worth including at the expense of missing,
> say, the electric MaryAnne?
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
Daddy Rolling Stone?  That was one of their BEST R&B numbers!!!!!
Sheesh!!!!  And the live version was in-f***ing-credible!  Hmmm.  
Do you like, say, "Slit Skirts?" C'mon, seriously though... There is
also a wealth of mediocre (I'm being charitable here) songs from their
latter day stuff to choose from.  I'd much rather have Daddy Rolling Stone
here.... 

Jeff.