[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
the "IN" or "AM" sound
- To: thewho@cisco.com
- Subject: the "IN" or "AM" sound
- From: Rick Carroll 617-329-3350 x496 <CARROLL@faxon.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 1994 15:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibitedSun Dec 7 12:14:22 PST 1997
- Hop-Count: 1
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta SOURCE.MUAS; Relayed; Thu, 15 Sep 1994 15:24:17 -0400
- Mr-Received: by mta QUASAR; Relayed; Thu, 15 Sep 1994 15:24:18 -0400
- Priority: normal
- Sender: owner-thewho@cisco.com
- Sensitivity: Company-Confidential
- Ua-Content-Id: 11897BCE1B00
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;3617241515091994/A30477/QUASAR]
>>After more comments on this forum, I dragged out my CD of WhoSellOut and
>>listened carefully on Mike's Pretty Good Stereo. It is definitely "The
>>AM Sound"
>>>>It's not that I doubt you.... But in the John interview I just read
>>>>today (here), he clearly states that there was no AM and FM.... So why would
>>>>there be anyway of distinguishing "AM"? Maybe it's the heavy effects used?...
>>>>
>>>>-the mayor
Hey Gang,
Although I'm fairly sure it's the "IN" sound for those that believe otherwise
consider doing this:
Argue that the "AM" in "the AM sound" suggests "ANTE MERIDIAN"
(morning) rather than "AMPLITUDE MODULATION" (radio frequency).
Hence "the AM sound" translates to "the morning sound". Sounds
like a legitimate jingle to me.
Rick Carroll
carroll@faxon.com