Re: Thought I'd seen it all...

[VW155mph@aol.com]

You missed the Europe only 2.8L V6 (VR6 204hp, 24 valves with variable valve timing and intake) and the 2.3L V5 (or VR5 with 150 hp).

> At 10:36 PM -0500 2/22/2000, Jose  Gomez wrote:
> >Thought I'd seen it all...but today what do I see ... some dude drivin' a
> >Jetta GT with a huge VR4 banner on his front winshield. I had to laugh. I
> >guess you can't blame the guy for trying at least he's driving a VW.
> 
> I guess I'm bored so I'm going to stretch this reply into several 
> paragraphs, maybe it will spawn some discussions...
> 
> No, don't give him that much credit. I don't know of any V shaped 4 
> cylinder motors, not to mention any that VW ever put in their cars.
> 
> The whole point of the VR6 is that by having a narrow angle V, you 
> can produce a EXTREMELY compact 6 cylinder motor into the TINY bays 
> of the A3 (and now A4) platform! It is even conceivable (although it 
> would have to be a work of genius) to put a VR6 into a New Beetle.
> 
> The whole point of a "VR4" is completely lost, because you could fit 
> an inline 4 (as VWAG easily does to this day) into the engine bay of 
> any VW or Audi platform.
> 
> Only until the current A4 series has it even been considered that VW 
> would put a V6 into the car (as opposed to the narrow angle V of the 
> VR6). They still use the VR6 because it fits so easier than the Audi 
> V6 engine.
> 
> Also, VW built a concept car, the W12. This was essentially two VR6 
> motors in the same chassis... again, they probably chose the VR6 
> because it fit better into the concept car (i.e. it looked like W as 
> opposed to \/\/) than two Audi V6 engines would.
> 
> The ideal goal is to get as much power into as little space as 
> possible using the least weight possible when designing a sports car. 
> For some designers, 4, 6, even 8 cylinders are not enough, so they 
> build V engines to save space. Or, some designers like flat (boxer) 
> style engines, or inline engines-- either due to the additional power 
> or torque they can get in different orientations (don't ask me why 
> this happens, it apparently does without me knowing how or why ;).
> 
> When you're dealing with six cylinders or more in these 
> configurations, you have to build your engine bay to be large. Which 
> means a rear mounted engine in some high end sportscars (and hence, 
> traditionally rear wheel drive).
> 
> This is the "I don't care how much space it takes, as long as I get a 
> lot of power for the weight, I'm happy" approach.
> 
> Our VR6 motors are the middle of the road. It's the "I need to fit a 
> lot of power into a small space, and if the power is good, the weight 
> isn't so much an issue". Die hard VR6 fans will say "there is no 
> replacement for displacement" in opposition of the next approach...
> 
> Then there is the 4-banger turbo approach. It's the "I want to reduce 
> weight as much as possible, and save space, and squeeze out as much 
> power as possible." This is where the VW/Audi 1.8T engine comes in, 
> and although I haven't driven one, it apparently is a kick ass power 
> plant.
> 
> Of course, there is everything in between and further, from, as I 
> mentioned earlier the W12 configuration of two VR6 engines melted 
> together into one powerplant, (and probably even more, although I 
> don't know of any sportscars that use > 12 cylinders)  and I don't 
> know of any thing more gutless that VW puts into its cars than the 
> 2.0 Liter Gas 4 banger (and some people would argue that the 1.9 
> Liter Deisel TDI 4 banger is potentially the weakest engine that VW 
> put into its cars in the past five years).
> 
> So, VWAG, under the brands of VW and Audi, has the following range of 
> motors, which I have (in my OWN subjective order) placed in order of 
> power:
> 
> [I'm ignoring the Bugatti line (W18 engine!) or Bentley, etc. which VWAG owns
>   I'm also only showing the most capable configuration of an engine]
> 
> * W12 Concept car   12 Cylinder, W (dual VR6 configuration ???)
> * Audi 4.2L S8 V8 Audi engine (up to 5.4 sec. 0-60! -- approx. 355hp!)
> * Audi 2.6L S4 V6 Biturbo Audi engine (up to 5.7 sec. 0-60 -- approx. 260hp!)
> * VW 2.8L VR6 engine (up to 6.9 sec 0-60 -- approx. 174hp)
> * Audi 2.5L A4 V6 TDI Audi engine ( ??? -- approx. 148hp)
> * VW/Audi 1.8L A4 I4 Turbo ( ??? -- approx. 148 hp)
> * VW 2.0L I4 engine (well above 8 sec 0-60 -- approx 115hp)
> * VW 1.9L I4 TDI (well above 8 sec 0-60 -- approx 90hp)
> * VW 1.6L I4 (Europe only) (well above 9 sec 0-60 ??hp)
> 
> 
> 
> The really cool thing is that as VW/Audi enthusaists, we have a WIDE 
> variety of powerplants to choose from. From the humble and economic 
> 1.9L TDI, to the 1.8L Turbo I4 (recently announced) in the Golf & 
> Jetta (and for quite some time in the A4 & A6) to the ever popular 
> VR6 (in the GTI and Jetta), to the Audi V6 that does such a nice job 
> powering the Passat, A4, and S4 (among probably others), and of 
> course, the top of the line 4.2L S8 V8 engine....
> 
> (ignoring the multiple VR6 hybrids for the W12 and W18 concepts)
> 
> Anyhow, just thought I'd discuss the VW/Audi engine components-- 
> there are probably some of you with more details and comments about 
> this...
> 
> -K
> 
> 
> Khan Klatt                                         khan@mediaaccess.com
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Media Access Internet Solutions, Inc.             888.750.0777 tel
> http://www.mediaaccess.com                425.519.3741 fax
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------