Re: chips

["Billy T." <btylaska@onramp.net>]

Let's not jump to conclusions.  I have had both, and the g-chip was 4 hundredths
faster than the p-chip in the 1/8th mile, 9.62 vs. 9.66.  Negligable on the
street.  I drive enough at the track to be consistant(probably too much).  With
the p-chip, engine ran flawlessly.  With the g-chip, I have now, sounds like a
bag of marbles(slight detonation) under part throttle tap-in.  BUT, I am still
running it(g-chip).  Your results may vary, but unless you have had both, don't
make comparisons.

b-

FlyinVR6 wrote:

> The Garrett chip. The Neuspeed chip is like a snail compared to the G-chip.
> It's not even a discussion.
> -FlyinVR6
> ICQ : 8994103
> AIM : SwiftVR6
> LI Rep ClubH2O
> \X/ Real Drivers Wanted \X/
> http://members.aol.com/qwikvr6/index.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-jettaglx@igtc.com [mailto:owner-jettaglx@igtc.com]On Behalf
> Of Zab Biason
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 9:44 AM
> To: jettaglx@igtc.com
> Subject:
>
> I know the list has already talked about this before but I want to be sure
> before I buy a chip for my 98 GLX. What's the one that most of you guys have
> and haven't had any problems with? Does it really make a big difference in
> performance? I was leaning towards getting a Neuspeed P-chip. Any comments
> on that particular one?
> Thanks, any help would be appreciated.
>
> Zab