re: Tinsley, Pollard for Battie, Brown

[wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

You've got your thinking cap on and it's standing up straight.
Ray


> ** Original Subject: Tinsley, Pollard for Battie, Brown
> ** Original Sender: Bos3332@xxxxxxx
> ** Original Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:32:47 -0800 (PST)

> What do you guys think about this. Gives another PG we get a another big man,
> and opens up playing time at the SG/SF position with the cluster of players
> there. Especially with both Pollard and Tinsley being pushed to bench, it will
> solidfy our team alittle and give us more options. As well make us a little
> more physical with Pollard.-Tony
> 
> 
> Indiana trades:     C Scot Pollard  (4.5 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 0.3 apg in 14.1
> minutes)   PG Jamaal Tinsley   (7.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 7.5 apg in 30.6 minutes)
> Indiana
> receives:     C Tony Battie   (7.3 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 0.7 apg in 25.1 minutes)  
> SG Kedrick Brown  (2.8 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.4 apg in 13.1 minutes) Change in team
> outlook: -2.2 ppg, +1.1 rpg, and -6.7 apg.
> 
> Boston trades:  C Tony Battie   (7.3 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 0.7 apg in 25.1 minutes)  
> SG Kedrick Brown    (2.8 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.4 apg in 13.1 minutes) Boston
> receives:  C Scot Pollard  (4.5 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 0.3 apg in 23 games)     PG
> Jamaal
> Tinsley (7.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 7.5 apg in 73 games) Change in team outlook: +2.2
> ppg,
> -1.1 rpg, and +6.7 apg.
> 
> TRADE ACCEPTED
> 
> Due to Indiana and Boston being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked.
> Indiana and Boston had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary
> given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade
> satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
> 
> 
> You have been assigned Trade ID number 1287287

>** --------- End Original Message ----------- **