Allow Me to Clarify

["Josh O." <igtcjosh@xxxxxxxxx>]

Garnett is an impact player, of course; with his
talent, basketball IQ, and skill level, how could he
not be?  But he doesn't really impose himself on a
game; in a big game, I'll take Sam Cassell or even
Antoine.  Like David Robinson, Garnett has never been
able to translate his unearthly abilities into
winning, or even for that matter competing at the
highest level.  Sure sure, if he was in the east, he
would play the Nets in the conference finals.  BFD.  I
want a guy who will make an impact on the W and L
column, not just fill a stat sheet.  

I just think that there is a vogue now for
multi-skilled, ultra-mobile seven-footers, just as a
few years ago everyone wanted "Scottie Pippin types"
i.e. slashing 6'8" point forwards.  But in fact, very
few of these "KG clones" is even comparable to the
original, and EVEN THE ORIGINAL CAN'T TAKE OVER A
GAME.  I don't think that KG is a top three player, or
a top five player, or even a top ten player in the
NBA.  Call me crazy, or call me a pervert.  I'll take
the guy who you can hand the ball to in the fourth
quarter and say, "carry us on your back, champ."  That
means Shaq, Kobe, Duncan, Kidd, Pierce, Cassell,
Iverson, Gary Payton, Steve Francis.  NOT Ray Allen,
Kevin Garnett, Jamal Mashburn, Rasheed Wallace, Chris
Webber, or the other stat-stuffers.  (The jury is
still out on Tracy McGrady.) 

I want a winner with my top-five pick.  Period. 
Skills, athleticism, upside, and all the rest of it
are only means to one end:  winning.

Josh

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com