re: More on Baker, from Seattle, and it's not good

[bird <birdw@xxxxxxx>]

> From : "Berry, Mark  S" < berrym@xxxxxxxxxxxx >
> Apparently some on the list feel I'm beating a dead horse, but I feel 
> it's
> completely relevant. This is an excerpt from a Frank Hughes column in 
> the
> Tacoma Tribune:
The written evidence on Baker is always Frank Hughes.  Here's why: 
Frank Hughes writes for the Seattle paper (forget the name, it's 
unimportant).  Frank Hughes writes about Vin Baker.  Frank Hughes gets 
popular.  Frank Hughes writes more about Vin Baker.  Vin leaves, Frank 
Hughes still writes about Vin Baker.

If you read the Seattle papers before the Vin Baker trade, you'd know 
that Frank Hughes has built his "professional" reputation on writing 
about two subjects in Seattle; Vin Baker and Gary Payton.  Every once 
in a while, the Glove goes wacky and Frank writes about it.  Otherwise, 
there's Vin Baker to tear into.

Continually pointing out what a hack like Frank Hughes thinks is hardly 
constructive.

Oh, and I also think that Paul Gaston should be destroyed.

Bird