Re: We should be in it for the long haul

["Dan Forant" <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It does get tiresome. The Celts will find a way to lose. Either by lack of
*D*, offense, coaching or just plain foul shooting. It just isn't a *team*.

DanF

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cecil" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: We should be in it for the long haul


> I think you should check past box scores.  Walker usually plays pretty
well
> when matched up against Webber.
>
> But you can't miss 13 shots from the line and expect to beat a quality
team
> like the Kings.  Having said that, if Webber misses the 3, we'd all be
> ecstatic.  I thought we were very sloppy our passing, and if you had told
me
> that we would hold the Kings to less the 100 points after the way they
shot
> the ball in the 1st quarter, I'd have laughed.
>
> Cecil
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Lyell <jlyell@netzero.net>
> To: <Celtic4Hire@AOL.com>; <celtics@igtc.com>;
> <Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 2:28 PM
> Subject: RE: We should be in it for the long haul
>
>
> > Walker just continues to get ate up by Webber.  He outplays him every
game
> I
> > have seen.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-celtics@igtc.com [mailto:owner-celtics@igtc.com]On Behalf Of
> > Celtic4Hire@AOL.com
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:12 PM
> > To: celtics@igtc.com; Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: We should be in it for the long haul
> >
> >
> > It was nice to have the Cs actually competing against a good team.
> > Regardless
> > of the coaching or style of play, the Cs just don't have enough talent
on
> > the
> > floor. They got the dynamic duo and the rest of the players are way
> > substandard. The problem for the future is that other than Kedrick and
> maybe
> > a little for JR, they are are all peaked out. No one is going to get any
> > better. I think JR can become a little more consistant and a better
> pull-up
> > jumper. However, I don't think he penetrates that well and isn't that
> great
> > a
> > passer. I think he is a great back up point but he doesn't butter my
toast
> > as
> > the long term solution at point guard. Everyone knows Kedrick's upside
but
> > the coach is content on waiting until next year.
> >
> > The second unit is the case in point. You got Blount, Walter, Delk, Long
> and
> > then either Walker or Pierce. The only offense those guys can muster is
> what
> > ever Walker or PP can do. These guys would be the 10-12 players on most
> > other
> > teams.
> >
> > Do we really think the draft picks will help out next year? Can we get a
> few
> > more good free agents on the cheap? I have serious doubts.  You see, I
> would
> > be playing Kedrick all day, regardless of the mistakes because he is
your
> > only hope of improving. It is either that or we have to hope that PP
will
> > get
> > 40 or 50 every night in the playoffs. I am in it for the long haul. I
> don't
> > think Obie is...
> >
> > DJessen33
> >
> > DJessen33