Is Shammond really 205 lbs?

[Celtic4Hire@xxxxxxx]

You beat the Nets by shutting down Kidd and making their bench work extra 
hard to get anything.  You can't stop Kidd's shot with 6' PGs, but you CAN 
stop him from getting where he wants to go with quicker men. 

This is the one thing that bothers me about the Nets. Our present winning 
formula is our defense (which showed up again last night) and our two scoring 
stars. However, Kidd and his fast breaking prevents us from getting into our 
no. 1 asset, the defense set. I'm not sure if a quicker guard is the answer 
or that would have already been successful for other teams. I am thinking an 
athletic larger guard. I am wondering how Kedrick would do against Jason, if 
all he had to think about was slowing him down and preventing him from 
passing. They tried Erik Williams who has the savvy on him last year but Kidd 
left him in the dust. 

A wild hope would be Shammond Williams although he doesn't have the height to 
block the vision. But do you know that Shammond is listed at 205 lbs! I can't 
find any other 6-1, 6-2 point guard near that weight! Kenny weighed a 
whooping 168, Stockton at 175 but no one over 190 lbs. Shammond is all muscle 
so it just doesn't seem right. Either he is shorter than listed or the weight 
can't be right. I checked NBA.com and some previous basketball magazines and 
they are all consistent. If he weighs that much, I would think he would be 
able to body the opposing point guards more in the style of Erick Strickland. 
You would think he would be more physical on defense than shown to date. 
Maybe when he picks up the defense scheme. At any rate, since we have no hope 
of getting a Gary Payton type, maybe we can develop Shammond enough to at 
least irritate Kidd a little...

DJessen33