RE: It Wouldn't Surprise Me To See...

["James A. Hill" <jahill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry I did miss that distinction.  Thanks for clarifying.  I did not mean
to misrepresent what you wrote. <Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Niles [mailto:shizzjr@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:37 PM
To: jahill@leasingservice.com; celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Re: It Wouldn't Surprise Me To See...


Just to clarify...  I was not saying that I expect Washington to play bad or
for any of those things that I mentioned to actually happen. My point was
that you can take any situation and twist it so that you can make your
point. That's why we see some people picking the C's to do very well, and
others picking them to do not so well. It's all in how you look at it. I was
only saying that Ray only sees the bad side in everything Celtic related.
But for other teams, he only sees good things.


>From: "James A. Hill" <jahill@leasingservice.com>
>To: "Celtics \(E-mail\)" <celtics@igtc.com>
>Subject: Re: It Wouldn't Surprise Me To See...
>Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:13:44 -0400
>
> >Anyone can twist anything to look a certain way. You made Washington out
>to
>be a contender; I made them out to be a bottom
> >dweller. The key is all in how you look at things.
>
>While skipping most of what was written here... Snip..
>
>I bring notice to this quote from RealGM:
>
>Washington -  Guard Michael Jordan declared the Wizards will seriously
>compete for the Eastern Conference Championship this season
>
>My guess is contender if MJ say's so.
>
>Snoopy,  Are you running "book" on these squabbles?  Payout could be in
>Mrs.
>Fields cookies or chocolate milk bones...
>
><Jim




_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com