Re: Delk & Rogers

["pmaurice" <damekmo@teleport.com>]

Let's all read this part together. Slowly. Can you feel the love? I know I
can. I'm all gooey inside.


> And this leads to the final point: Delk and Rogers simply aren't very
good.
> Delk looks a lot smaller than 6-2, and nobody is going to confuse him for
> Gus Williams. Rogers just doesn't have much game. Neither seems to fit in.
> What was Wallace thinking? This trade only works if these guys, and
> especially Delk, come in and light up the floor. These guys are cut from
> the same lame cloth as Battie, Potapenko, McCarty, Williams et al. They
are
> not quality players. They are the sort of guys who always end up on
> mediocre or lousy teams. (Maybe that is why they ended up in Boston,
huhh?)
>
> So dig this, the ultimate insult: the Celtics are actually a worse team
> after this trade right now than they were before the trade. And this was a
> trade that was all about giving away the right to down-the-road potential
> to make the team better right now.

I'm going to stop beating the dog now.

Paul M.