RE: OK, but sign - trade?

["Orion" <jlyell@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Would the Clippers be satisfied in Tinsley? Sterling would rather than
paying out big bucks to Davis or Miller.  Could we do a 3 way with them
getting Tinsley and us getting Odom and Wilcox?



John






-----Original Message-----
From: owner-celtics@igtc.com [mailto:owner-celtics@igtc.com]On Behalf Of
Josh Ozersky
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:51 PM
To: celtics list
Subject: Re: OK, but sign - trade?


Interesting idea...I'm also wondering if the salaries match
up for the indiana trade.  It seems like Croshere / Tinsley
add up to $8 M, and Kenny will be getting 11.  That's not
within 15% unless my math is wrong...I wonder who else might
be involved.

Josh

"Dave" <nospamforme@uno.com> wrote in message
news:y2EX8.13041$uw.7191@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
> Lets say we come up with Sundev. That'd be better than Blount and help
with
> Pot gone. Suppose we even get Tinsley and Austin C. That'd better than
> McCarty at the 3 and KA never had a lot C fans eh?
>
> Anyhow, is it possible to sign / trade Rodney if we're not going to keep
> him?
>
> Several interested teams, couldn't we still upgrade with a sign and trade
> with Rodney?
>
> Lastly, the C's rarely do what happens in the "rumors" section of
anything.
> So, the jury is still way out on anything.
>
> Dave
Unlimited Long Distance only $29.95/ month!
Sign Up Today! www.netzerolongdistance.com