Re: LaFrentz - another variation

["Thomas Murphy" <tfmiii@worldnet.att.net>]

LOL!

Yeah, the Ostertag variation was pretty much a joke. Was just fiddling
around seeing who might want Lenard and saw a potential all-Kansas
frontline. (I can't BELIEVE how much 'Osterloof' - LOL-  is taking Utah for
. . . but then there's always Big Country to put it in perspective I guess
;)

Cheaney would just be cap fodder in any scenario, serious or joke - because
his game is now a joke ;)

----- Original Message -----
From: <Mafiaso316@aol.com>
To: <tfmiii@worldnet.att.net>; <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: LaFrentz - another variation


> What have you been smoking???????????????  Why the hell would we want this
> trade to happen????????????????????????  Osterloof is terrible and we
already
> had Cheaney.    No way, C-Mon, come up with a better freaking trade
proposal
> than this.
>
> Mafiaso316