Re: Rumor has it that Denver doesn't wanna keep Cook

[kevin <bostonceltics17@yahoo.com>]

i am not from boston area (or usa for that matter), so I don't know
enough about Gaston to have a handle on him. 
But based on what I learned serving 2 years of national service
(army/navy), we had this(and still have) during lunch "take what you
need, finish what you take". 

I believe Gaston has the same motto. I think he has below
understanding with Wallace (and Pitino):

- work within the cap
- you are responsible for whomever you signed/traded
- you can cut a player only when it is the aboslute last resort (Greg
Minor) or when you've got your money back (John Hotrod Williams)

agree?

kevin

"Robert Chin" <bobchin@shore.net> wrote:
>Frustrated, Robert, like the rest of us?  Yeah, the EASY answer is to cut
>Anderson.  We all know ThanksDad would never do that.  He's not going to pay
>Anderson to sit, he's not going to let that money count against the cap
>without getting something, no matter how minimal it is, from it.  Today's
>C's, under the current stewardship, are not about winning.  They are about
>profitability.
>



>Robert Tukey Jr. <rtukey@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
>news:3B810971.B101600@us.ibm.com...
>>
>> Fine. So cut Anderson. I'd rather have had Kahlid El-Amin than Anderson
>> for Anderson's salary plus the minimum--why not Cook? Assuming he can be
>> gotten for the minimum, he's young and might just end up being another
>> surprise like Palacio. Is having Cook around going to be any worse than
>> having Anderson around?