RE: more scuttlebutt

[Way Of The Ray <wayray@ix.netcom.com>]

I beg to differ. All my rumors have sources, some of a poor quality in
nature,
but that's rumors for you. How many rumors actually come true? 5 percent
or so. Not an exact science for sure. You gotta get the thresher out and
seperate
the wheat from the chaff.

Ray


--- OzerskyJA <OzerskyJA@cmog.org> wrote:

> Subject: RE: more scuttlebutt
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:43:10 -0400
> 
> I wrote to Mark that he seems to have caught
> Ray's disease
> or bringing us sourceless rumors (I would even
> settle for an
> internet rumor at this point.)  Still, if it is
> true, I like it a lot.  
> Camby has to pass the physical, but you're
> talking about a guy
> who led the league in blocked shots before he
> was made into 
> a platoon player on the Knicks.  He's a
> megatalent, a first overall
> pick (like Pervis, I know) with proven
> offensive and defensive talent.
> This would be very exciting.  The guy also has
> a very nice passing 
> touch and a high basketball IQ.  I think he
> would make us a lot better.
> He would also allow us to play Tony at power
> forward as a twin towers
> approach.  Put that in your leprechaun pipe and
> smoke it.
> 
> Josh Ozersky	
> Marketing Communications Specialist 
> Corning Museum of Glass
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Anne Cankosyan
> [SMTP:bceltics@mindspring.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, September 22, 2000 6:15 PM
> > To:	Berry, Mark  S; celtics@igloo.igtc.com
> > Subject:	Re: more scuttlebutt
> > 
> > 
> > > Apparently, the Knicks still are talking to
> the Celts about Vitaly. It
> > > doesn't involve Houston, but the names on
> the other end being tossed
> > around
> > > are Camby and Erick Strickland.
> > 
> > I have heard that Camby is a headcase.  I
> can't see him in the Celtic
> > green....I'm trying hard, but just can't.  He
> lacks commitment and does
> > not
> > like to play if he in slightly injured.
> > 
> > Anne (who mostly lurks)
>