Re: Subject: RE: Re. How about Glen Rice?

[kevin lok <kevin.lok@lycosmail.com>]

Isn't it funny and ironic? Why do we want to trade and we ourselves could use "a true banger and rebounder who does not demand the ball on offense."

my money's is on battie/pervis/barros being on the trading block now. Fort's name on the rumour mill and lack of playing time is just negotiation tactics on his next contract. That's how I see it.

kevin


> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:32:03 -0500 (EST)
> From: "David J. Boutte" <dajubo@earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: Re. How about Glen Rice?
>
> My intent was to name Fortson as the principal, but agree that Fortson alone
> is not enough. My premise is that the Lakers don't appear to want Glen Rice,
> so he may be obtained at a bargain. Also, I believe that Fortson is the type
> of player the Lakers are looking for--a true banger and rebounder who does
> not demand the ball on offense.
>
> - -David