Re: Radical Lineup

["David" <dajubo@earthlink.net>]

I see your point. Since Cheaney has shown an ability to play good 
defense, maybe Calbert could play at the 2 guard position and 
Pierce could play at the SF instead of Williams.

I guess the other solution would be for Walker to play the "point 
forward" role.

By the way, can Adrian play the point? He certainly seems to have 
the mentality to do so. If his ball handling skills are up to the task, 
he might be perfect.

-David


On 16 Apr 00, at 17:19, Cecil Wright wrote:

> Who would defend their guards?  Walker?  Seriously, who would guard
> Iverson or Marbury in this lineup?  That is one concern.
> 
> Cecil
> For the best in online shopping, please visit
> www.cdub.bigsmart.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David <dajubo@earthlink.net>
> To: <celtics@igtc.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 4:10 PM
> Subject: Radical Lineup
> 
> 
> > This may sound crazy, but if there are no major changes next
> > season, I believe that this is a lineup that could be effective:
> >
> > PG-Walker
> > SG-Pierce
> > C-Battie
> > PF-Fortson
> > SF-Williams
> >
> > Pitino has said that Walker has Magic Johnson-like skills, so why
> > not utilize them? Walker has shown that he is capable of playing the
> > point in the past.
> >
> > As far as Battie is concerned, this is no knock on Potapenko. The
> > reasoning is that I believe we need Fortson to play a significant
> > role, and Battie's defensive presence down low will help make up for
> > Fortson's lack of height.
> >
> > What do y'all think?
> >
> > -David
> >
> 
>