[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Russell
Without showing complete and utter disrespect for members of
the golfing fraternity, there are none that I know of who can compare as an
athlete with those who compete in the other major sports. Not in
athleticism, stamina, endurance etc. Some of the worst conditioned
individuals I know are outstanding golfers, but are unable to do what some of us
would call the most simple of other athletic skills. Many pro athletes are
very good golfers, but I'm not sure that the golfers cam reciprocate at a
similar level.
While it is no small task, to achieve as Jack has done, to
compare his athletic skills to someone like Russell or Orr is highly suspect
IMHO.
Cecil
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:05
PM
Subject: Re: Russell
The "Golden Bear" belongs in the top 10. Team players are just
that, but Jack was out there all by himself. His Major's record may never be
broken. In general, ESPN's selection's are ridiculous.
At 05:28 PM
9/27/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>
ESPN just came out this week that Russell is #18. Okay guys and
gals, here goes...
On my list, Russell is #2. ESPN's list has been a
crock since Bobby Orr was listed as 31. Russell joins the list of luminaries
that include Orr, Larry Bird, Joe DiMaggio, Ty Cobb, Joe DiMaggio, Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar, and Jerry Rice as superstar athletes who were ranked way too
low. This means that people like Carl Lewis, Jack Nicklaus, Babe Didrickson
and Muhammad Ali were ranked ABOVE Russell.
This is a testimonial to
the absolute stupidity of this list, and a further condemnation of Russell's
true legacy which perhaps is a reflection on his adverse relationship with
fans and the media.
Lewis and Nicklaus don't make my top 50.
Didrickson and Ali make my top 30. I find it insulting to find Russell
ranked below them.
I would love to write a rebuttal article on this,
but I think that the last article I wrote on Russell will suffice (read it
at
<http://www.bobgeorge.com/celtics/052699.html>http://www.bobgeorge.com/celtics/052699.html
). The fact that people today don't understand the brilliance of Russell's
career is both assinine and tragic.
But hearing the defense of
Russell's career from a Celtic fan does not hold water to the rest of the
sports world. I am dismissed as being too parochial and biased. So again, I
need to let that article speak for me on behalf of Russell.
Any of
these people ranked ahead of Russell, I defy them to match Russell's
championship excellence. The Celtics remain the greatest dynasty in sports
(the Skankees had several disjointed dynasties, but never matched the 13
outstanding years of Russell's career).
Agree, disagree, let me
know.
Bob George
Read Bob George's Best Of Boston Sports
At
<http://www.bobgeorge.com>http://www.bobgeorge.com
<<<<
- References:
- Re: Russell
- From: Dan Forant Sr <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>