Re: three way for Baker?

[Josh Ozersky <josh_ozersky@yahoo.com>]

Let me get this straight:  we give up Antoine Walker
AND Ron Mercer for Vin Baker, and you consider that a
steal for us?  If we traded Antoine straight up for
Baker Seattle should get down on its needs and thank
the Virgin and all the angels.  Gimme a break.


--- DJessen33@aol.com wrote:
> Tom and all,
> I put Brand in the picture because I couldn't think
> of anything else the 
> Bulls could give up to be involved. After reading
> the today's Mays comments 
> and some comments by CeltSteve, I understand better
> what may be going down. 
> Chicago will use Mercer and Ellison as further cap
> reduction for a further 
> superstar free agent signing in Krause's continuing
> effort to be proved the 
> mastermind behind the previous Bull dynasty. Mercer
> will be resigned by the 
> Bulls for the maximum after he is a free agent.
> Ellison goes bye-bye. Celts 
> get Baker. Seattle gets Kukoc, Barros and Shintius.
> However, it doesn't seem 
> to be enough for Seattle to me. 
> 
> Seattle-Kukoc, Barros, Schintius
> Celts-Baker
> Bulls-Mercer, Ellison
> 
> If you throw in Battie to the Sonics in addition,
> the Celts have given up too 
> much. I don't think Seattle would want Artest. The
> bottom line is between the 
> Bulls and Celts, who wants this trade the most as to
> who throws something 
> else in. The Bulls do have two first round picks
> next year. This trade, as 
> shown above, would be a steal for the Celts...
> 
> DJessen33
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com