Re: PF Possibilities

[peter delevett <pdelevett@amcity.com>]

Maybe, but who does he take minutes away from? If he plays SF, it means fewer
minutes there for either Walker or Pierce (regardless of whatever happens with
Mercer); and if they try him as an undersized PF, he's taking minutes from
Walker or Battie (not to mention a healthy Popeye). I'm not sure that in
either scenario his production greatly (if at all) outweighs the production of
the people he'd be replacing. So how would you see Rogers fitting into the rotation?



Alex Wang wrote:
> 
>It should be noted that this season was Rodney Rogers' worst (since his
> rookie year) evidently because he came into camp out of shape. The two
> previous years he was 13.2 ppg (46% fg), 5.1 rpg and 15.1 ppg (46% fg),
> 5.6 rpg. Several teams seem to be bidding for his services using their
> $2M exception, and I wouldn't mind seeing the Celtics use theirs on him.
> He would certainly fill a useful role off our scoring-challenged bench.
>  e