[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NY Times: It's The Real Beginning Of The End For The NBA
January 4, 1999
SPORTS OF THE TIMES
It's the Real Beginning of the End for the N.B.A.
By WILLIAM C. RHODEN
NEW YORK -- The media campaign began the last two
weeks with full-page newspaper advertisements. The
blitz continues Monday night on "Larry King Live," when
Billy Hunter, the executive director of the players'
association, and Patrick Ewing, the union's president,
bring its case before the nation.
With only three days to go before the league's deadline
for canceling the season, Hunter and Ewing are
expanding the battle against National Basketball
Association owners from the bargaining table to the
court of public opinion, where up to now the players
have been crucified. The NBA has done its typically
masterful job of presenting its side and putting the
players in the worst possible light.
"You go around, you realize that people are either
misinformed, uninformed or they refuse to be informed,"
Hunter said Saturday. "The perception is that, one,
we're on strike, two, that the players are being
unfair, or unreasonable."
Hunter -- whose players are locked out, not on strike
-- was asked if he thought about how history might
portray him if the unthinkable occurs and the entire
season is lost. For NBA Commissioner David Stern, it
would be part of a long legacy, but this is the first
major chapter in Hunter's professional sports
biography.
"That's something I haven't even considered," Hunter
said. "That's the farthest thing from my mind. All I'm
concerned about is the here and now."
That may well be, but Hunter has introduced a distinct
and consistent civil-rights motif to the
seven-month-old lockout; a We-Shall-Not-Be-Moved
obstinacy by the players. The civil-rights analogy is
dismissed by critics as posturing at worst; as, at
best, an attempt by Hunter to use race as a superficial
bond to keep the players unified. But movements are not
sustained by posturing. Instead, they take strength
from the resistance of the structure they push up
against.
In this case the NBA owners, figuring they only had to
lean on players to win concessions, anticipated an easy
game. "I can see why," Hunter said. "The perception of
professional athletes, especially basketball players,
because they've never been challenged before, is that
they weren't up to the task. That if you put a gun to
their heads they would collapse. But that hasn't
happened. And that's a quandary now."
The unexpected resolve shown by the players may, at
least for some, have its roots in the fact that they
have gotten beyond the immediacy of money, to an
appreciation of what came before them and a concern for
players coming after them. They've grasped broader
issues of principle. During the protests of the 1950s,
the issue was not sitting beside white customers at
lunch counters -- it was sitting where one pleased. The
issue for the players is not just splitting $2 billion
in revenue, but sharing the profits of an empire that
each side created -- one with money, the other with
muscle.
Hunter, 55, helped players understand that, in large
part by explaining that the foundation of his own
resolve goes beyond a labor dispute or an ego battle
with Stern. His foundation is a deeply rooted family
tradition of battling for liberty.
Hunter's great great grandfather was William Still, one
of the most respected black operatives on the
Underground Railroad in the East. In the years leading
to the Civil War, Still led Philadelphia's Vigilance
Committee, which provided assistance to fugitive
slaves. He was born free, but both his parents had been
slaves. Still's mother escaped before he was born; his
father bought his way out of slavery and died free.
Hunter first learned about his heritage while he was an
undergraduate at Syracuse, where he played football.
Hunter led a drive to boycott games against Southern
schools with segregated stadiums.
While owners certainly don't have to worry about their
players suddenly becoming radical, the lockout may have
roused one or two sleeping giants.
"Historically, professional athletes -- especially
African-American athletes, those who have made it --
have always been apolitical," Hunter said. "Everybody's
always told them that you've got to just play ball,
keep your nose down, stay out of trouble and you're
going to be all right. All of a sudden owners see that
some of the ballplayers are talking about standing on
principle, they're talking about history and
experiences their people had in terms of struggles.
"For the majority of players, the lockout has been a
wake-up call. Having missed two months and some play,
they understand that this game is tangential. This is a
taste of what it will be like when your career ends."
Is this the beginning of the end? No one is sure, not
even Hunter. "Ballplayers will continue to receive
substantial salaries, but they just won't be
phenomenal," Hunter said. "They'll just be more
controlled. Maybe that's what it means."
Rest assured: this struggle won't be over when the
lockout ends. Things may get better, but they'll never
be the same.
Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company