[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Steve Bulpett On The Players' Cause
Boston Herald
1/1/99
Cause adds up to little for players
The NBA/by Steve Bulpett
Friday, January 1, 1999
The NBA players would be wise to avoid using calculators
if their season is canceled next Thursday. The numbers
that define what their collective bargaining fight has
come to will not be pleasant.
With the Players Association having already agreed to the
most critical principles the owners are seeking, the major
difference is that the league is ultimately offering 54
percent of revenues. The union wants 57 percent.
``It's impossible to do the math because of how different
guys' salaries are,'' said one agent. ``But over the long
haul that's not going to amount to a hell of a lot per
man.''
While the players came away from their latest
teleconference preaching unity, it's hard to believe the
numerical differences are enough to have them kiss off
their season.
The main issue that the league needs to relent on is the
proposed rule that has a player forfeiting his rights to a
Bird Exception contract (his team being allowed to go over
the cap to keep him as a free agent) if he's traded in the
final year of his present deal.
The targets are the Alonzo Mourning types who threaten to
leave (in his case, Charlotte) if they're not traded. They
then make a big score with the team they desire to go to
(Miami for Mourning).
But what of the guy who's been waiting his turn for market
value and is sent away in his last year?
Most of the other rules the players don't like are
designed to offer incentive to players for remaining with
their teams. While also trying to prevent players from
holding financial weaponry to management's head, such
clauses attempt to answer a larger matter - that the fans
need to be able to identify stars with certain teams to
develop rivalries.
Or as David Stern has put it, ``Who did Dave Winfield play
for?''
Stern and the league are trying to get the union rank and
file to vote on the latest proposal, and Heat free agent
Keith Askins agrees in perhaps the most strongly worded
and compelling player statement yet.
``If (union director) Billy Hunter is so strong, the
masses will vote it down,'' Askins told a Miami reporter.
``What's wrong with putting it out here, letting us vote
on it and see what happens? I feel we all need to have a
final say on whether we're going to sit this season out.
``If it went to a vote I believe (the latest NBA offer)
would pass. In a bargaining situation, somebody's going to
lose and that usually is the smaller guy. Right now we're
the smaller guy.
``I understand we're fighting for a cause but if we don't
play this year, we're taking a risk we might not be
playing next year. I don't have much longer to play and
there are a lot of guys out there like me.''
Looking at others suffering from the work stoppage, Askins
added, ``We're talking about all the money we're losing,
(but) look at the guys just selling hot dogs, breaking
down the courts. It's hurting them by missing $500 a
month. That's a lot of money to a lot of people. A lot of
us have totally lost sight about how much this game means
to a lot of people.''
Gary Payton acknowledged the reason fans view the
management side differently: ``The owners still have a
billion dollars in the bank. They are in their big houses.
But they don't have gold chains around their necks and
Rolexes. They don't flaunt it like we do.''