[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply

To: (Celtics Email List) Celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply
From: Jim McMaster <mcmaster@sweng.stortek.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:30:48 -0600
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Sep 1998 09:37:30 -0300." <001f01bde237$f09f6ae0$8b06de18@default.andara.com>
Sender: owner-celtics@igtc.com

In message <001f01bde237$f09f6ae0$8b06de18@default.andara.com>, "Cecil 
Wright"
said:
> Missing front ends of bonus situations
> obviously is an aid to the trailing team.
> 
What the heck is a "front end" of a "bonus situation" in the NBA?  The fouled 
player gets two shots, whether he misses the first or not.  NBA announcers 
still talk about the "one and one" that went out in the 1960s, along with the 
"three to make two".  That does not make it correct.
-- 
Jim McMaster
mailto:mcmaster@sweng.stortek.com
Go Celtics!

References:
- Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply
  - From: "Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.andara.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Walker the Father?
Next by Date: Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply
Prev by thread: Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply
Next by thread: Re: Walker over Mercer -Reply
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread