[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Steve Bulpett: Union Faces Tough Task
Boston Herald
Players' union
faces tough
choice
by Steve Bulpett
10/22/98
With the NBA
players' union
leadership
meeting
yesterday in Las
Vegas and the
general
membership set
to convene there
today, there is
one collective
question the
group must ask
itself.
Do we feel
lucky?
The prospect for
a swift
conclusion to
the labor
impasse seemed
distant as union
director Billy
Hunter and
president
Patrick Ewing
led a discussion
that focused on
ways to buttress
the association
in the face of a
long work
stoppage. The
first two weeks
of the NBA
season have
already been
canceled and the
talk yesterday
was about
exhibition games
to raise money
for the union,
lines of credit
from banks and
other sports
union for
players and
exploratory talk
of a new league.
In the latter
case, a
subcommittee
will be formed
to look into
breaking away
from the NBA if
the entire
1998-99 season
is lost.
"The message
that's going to
come loud and
clear out of
this session is
that the players
are prepared to
hang as long as
they have to
hang," Hunter
said. "As soon
as that message
arrives home,
then I think the
NBA owners will
be prepared to
sit down and
engage in
good-faith
negotiations."
The failure of
the union to
agree to sit
down and
negotiate,
however, is an
issue, according
to NBA
leadership.
"This union
leadership
stymies us,"
commissioner
David Stern
said. "Russ
(Granik, the
deputy
commissioner)
and I, for
something over
50 years
combined, we've
been able to
negotiate with
every other
combination of
executive
directors and
presidents in
the history of
this union. And
somehow we are
unable to have a
conversation
that gets us any
negotiation."
Added Granik:
"In terms of
pressure to come
back to the
bargaining
table, my
goodness, if
both sides don't
have pressure to
make a deal,
then there is
something we
don't
understand."
After losing a
grievance ruling
Monday that
would have
forced the
owners to pay
players with
guaranteed
contracts during
the lockout, the
union is looking
for a power
base. But in
that the league
seems to hold
all the cards in
the current
labor matter,
the union's only
alternative may
be to knock over
the table and
walk out. In
other words,
though it said
yesterday it was
a last resort,
it may chose to
decertify
itself.
In that case,
the union
(officially the
National
Basketball
Players
Association)
will be removed
as bargaining
agent for the
players, who
will then be
able to sue the
league on
antitrust
grounds.
Traditionally,
union members
accept certain
conditions that
may be counter
to antitrust
laws in exchange
for inducements
-- financial and
otherwise.
With the players
having voted
this summer to
allow the union
leadership to
decertify if it
chooses, the
move could be
made quickly.
But it would
likely be a long
and uncertain
road for the
players.
If
decertification
were to occur,
an injunction
would be sought
to end the
lockout and the
NBA would impose
its new rules
and go back to
playing while
the players
fight the matter
in court. Those
players with
contracts under
effect would go
back to their
salaries, but
free agents and
rookies would be
forced to play
by the new rules
and then hope to
get money down
the road through
the legal
process.
The closest
example is that
of the NFL
players, who
decertified
after their 1987
strike and went
through a
five-year court
battle with the
owners before
settling. It may
also be
instructive for
the NBA players
to note that the
NFL now has a
hard salary cap,
meaning there
are no gaping
loopholes as
with the NBA's
soft cap.
As it stands
now, the NBA
owners can wait
out the union,
which has
avoided attempts
at negotiation
since last
week's session.
The league is
receiving its
scheduled
payments from
both NBC and
Turner
Broadcasting
and, even though
they may have to
alter future TV
contracts to
keep that money,
it is clearly
putting the
clubs in a much
better financial
state to
withstand the
absence of
games.
Stern and Granik
believe the
union's rank and
file do not
understand what
the league is
offering -- a
package they say
will raise
salaries by 20
percent over a
four-year
period.
Hunter,
meanwhile, seems
to think the
onus is on the
league.
"What the owners
may not realize
is that if they
continue to
antagonize the
fans, the fact
the players will
miss a few
paychecks may be
the least of
their worries,"
he said. "The
product may
suffer enormous,
irreparable
damage."