Re: Profile Of The Warrior's Todd Fuller

[Mister Ghost <mister_ghost@yahoo.com>]

Fuller averaged 3.4 rebounds in 10.8 minutes of playing times; that
projects to over 15 boards per 48 minute game - not bad.  Certainly
comparable to DeClerq who averaged 4.8 rebounds in 18.8 minutes of 
playing time, which projects out to 12.28 boards per 48 minutes.  So
Fuller is a better rebounder than DeClerq.
MG




---Icarus <skmishra@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>
> I completely agree with Paul. I live in the bay area and watch Fuller
> routinely  and  IMO Fuller is a wasted 1st round draft pick. Declerq
is a
> stud compared to Fuller. Fuller can't rebound and gets pushed around
in the
> paint despite being 6'11" and 255+. - Mishra
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: damekmo@teleport.com <damekmo@teleport.com>
> 
> 
> >
> >Now why would I ever judge an NBA player's ability to play in the
NBA by
> >watching him play in the NBA? You're right of course. All those
stiffs that
> >the Celtics have been putting on the floor for years....if only they
> >could've gone to a team like the Bulls, they all would've become
all-stars.
> >Please...Todd Fuller can barely move. The article said something
about Todd
> >Fuller working on his quickness?!? Todd Fuller's a slug and a foul
machine.
> >I'm going to write something I never thought I would. By this time
> >everybody knows how I feel about Andrew Declerq. However....Andrew
Declerq
> >is a better back-up center than Todd Fuller. Andrew Declerq is
> >salvagealble. Compared to Todd Fuller, Andrew Declerq is Bill
Russell.
> >That's it....I've just realized something. Things aren't as bad as I
> >thought. The Celtics could lose Walker, Mercer, and Anderson, but
as long
> >as Todd Fuller stays right where he is....there's hope. But...I'm
sure Todd
> >Fuller is a really, really nice guy.
> >
> >Paul M.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com