RE: re-Gaston is right (fwd)

["Noah P. Evans" <ishbak@conknet.com>]

>Please!  Pacers had plenty of chances to win and they didn't.

Hmmmm... my point exactly. The Pacers were an *obviously* better team. The
fact that they almost one despite have 8 guys on the court against them says
a lot about their team.


>  Please
> don't tell me that Pacers didn't get away with a foul either.

Did you actually watch that series? Either Davis or Smits weren't allowed to
even come near a bull driving to the basket. The bulls, on the other hand,
were allowed to hack and bump with impunity.

>  I don't
> like the Bulls either, but I give where credit is due.  If you don't
> like the Bulls, just say so.

I don't like the bulls, but not because of anything they do. I don't like
the Bulls because they are fake. The league hypes them and then goes to
great lengths to insure they win.



> :)  What CAN I say that.

I'll back up my statement. Jordan is a great player. But he is hardly the
"best ever" as NBA, NBC and TNT relentlessly gibber. I can't believe that
memories are short enough not to remember the far more impressive feats of
both Larry and Magic.

> On the mailing list... Probably no one. (including myself)  Yet, I'm sure
> many people out there will disagree with you here

Yeah but how well could they back it up?

> Also, how could you
> compare the Bulls teams of the 80's with Bulls of the 90's?  Two different
> teams.

Then how could you(not you specifically, people in general) call Jordan the
"best ever" if you can't compare teams? The Bulls did nothing until Pippen
came in. The celtics did pretty well with larry in his first year.

> I really don't think that you can compare the teams of different eras and
> it is pointless to do so.

Then how can anyone call a player the "best ever"?

Noah