Re: Intellectual etc

[mustang@gis.net (Michael A. DiZio)]

>
>>   But, as Mr. Nissen points out, I probably get more frustrated with
>>discussion of (silly ideas like) Mourning for Edney trades than with trying to
>>decipher Noam Chomsky.  (Which I tried to do in college in the 60s without
>>success.)
>
>So you want to have another go at it now? This is a Celtics mailing list
>and stupid though they may be , Edney for Mourning trades have relevance
>here. Mr Chomskys Linguistics lectures have nothing to do with this list as
>intellectually stimulating as I find them. (NOT) Noah is just jerking us
>all around and watching the fallout with a "sly grin". Intelligent
>discussion of the C's is fine, and I don't mind someone trying to raise the
>bar a little bit, but pedantic is pedantic. This isn't a forum for
>impressing the thesis committee with your overweening intellect.
>
>                                             Michael A. DiZio