RE: RP on Barros

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

Just as with Billups, Barros is not now or never will be a point.  He has had a decent year after some very disappointing ones.


On Saturday, April 11, 1998 5:28 PM, Cecil Wright [SMTP:nocw1@nsh.library.ns.ca] wrote:
> What are you basing it on?  I don't think statistically any of them are 
> better.  In fact, and I don't have anything to back this up, I don't 
> think any of them, with the possible exception of Nash, can shoot like 
> Dana.  He's improving at a position he's never had to play before and 
> he's got heart.
> 
> Cecil 
> 
> On Sat, 11 Apr 1998, John Lyell wrote:
> 
> > I agree Fisher, Nash & Eisley are definitely better at the point position.
> > 
> > 
> > On Friday, April 10, 1998 9:08 AM, Jeremy Warren [SMTP:jeremy.warren@alphatech.com] wrote:
> > >                       RE>RP on Barros                              4/10/98
> > > 
> > > I'll assume that he meant he wouldn't trade Dana for any other backup point
> > > guard.  But I still have to disagree.  I would rather have Howard Eisley,
> > > Derek Fisher, Steve Nash, and Eric Murdock than Dana Barros.  Is there anyone
> > > I'm forgetting?
> > > 
> > > Jeremy
> > > 
> > > Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 10:54:32 -0500
> > > From: Theresa Lee <tjoyce@mit.edu>
> > > Subject: RP on Barros
> > > 
> > > During the pregame show last night, Pitino talked about Dana Barros. He
> > > said that is the best backup point guard in the league and he would not
> > > trade him for any other point guard in the league. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >