No Subject

On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Wolvey wrote:

> Jeremy S. Warren wrote:
> > 
> >         We give Billups to Denver.  They move McDyess to Milwaukee. 
And
> > Milwaukee send us Vin Baker.  I think it works out well for everyone
> > except maybe Milwaukee because they could lose McDyess after one
season.
> > Denver would love it because Billups will sell tickets out there.  We
get
> > a talented, young-veteran, all-star.  And Milwaukee well maybe we can
also
> > send them a draft pick.  Or they could work out a contract extension
with
> > McDyess's agent before the trade becomes official.
> 
> Did you make up that trade after reading my idea of getting McDyess and
> then trading him to Milwaukee for Vin Baker, as that what it sounds like
> and I've had several e-mails about it. Nice idea, just we keep the 4
> stomach upsets.
> 
> Wolv
> 
> -- 
> MZ
	Yes Wolv your trade idea was the inspiration behind mine.  And
yes we would keep the feeble four, but you have to be realistic.  Why
would Denver or Milwaukee take any of those four in the trade?  I would be
happy to get a net exchange of Vin Baker for Chauncey Billups.  We would
be coming out way ahead.  The only reason it has any chance of working is
that Denver values Billups more than any other team in the league.

	As for the Orlando rumor, giving up Chauncey just to move deadwood
is a bad idea.  I would have been in favor of doing that with Eric
Williams, but it's too late for that.  Outside of Antoine, Chauncey,
and Mercer are there any players on this team with positive trade value?
I'm thinking maybe Mills, but I doubt it.  He has to prove that he can hit
three pointers from the restored line first.

Jeremy



- ----------