[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Draft, Campbell/Van Exel
- Subject: Re: Draft, Campbell/Van Exel
- From: "JLyell" <jlyell@concentric.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 19:58:13 -0700
Get serious ! Are you not aware of previous Nick Van Exel tirades & ref
tossing incident ? He has been a whiner since his days at Cincinnati.
With the way Van Exel & Campbell played in that series I don't blame them
for going to Bryant. He is their future, Van Exel a temporary fix.
- ----------
> From: Nault <rnault@ptialaska.net>
> To: DJessen33@aol.com
> Cc: celtics@igtc.COM
> Subject: Re: Draft, Campbell/Van Exel
> Date: Thursday, May 15, 1997 11:49 AM
>
> I don't get what all this stuff is about when it comes to Van Exel. What
> did the guy do that was so horrible? Sure he had that incident with
Harris
> a week ago, but come one, I would be mad at that guy too. Any freak that
> chooses to give KOBE BRYANT the game ending shot is stupid and should not
> be an NBA coach. I have heard that Harris didn't make the decision,
> management did, but I don't believe that for a second. I say this
because
> the Lakers' management has a must-win kind of attitude, not a
> time-to-develope-our-players attitude. Thats why they payed the big
bucks
> for Shaq, to win a championship in the VERY NEAR future. Besides if they
> were so interested in developing Kobe Bryant why the hell did he average
> five minutes a game for the season?
>
> Tim
>
> >In a message dated 97-05-15 11:39:09 EDT, you write:
> >
> ><< Van Exel is a smoking gun. >>
> >
> >I believe the term you are looking for is 'loose cannon'.
>
>
> Nault
> rnault@ptialaska.net
>
> Visit the PatriotsPage at:
> http://www.ptialaska.net/~rnault/PatriotsPage.html
>
>